Descripcion

Monoecious shrubs up to 0.8 m tall, with woody xylopodium; stems erect, unarmed, densely hirsute with sessile glandular trichomes; internodes 3–8.5 cm. Leaves opposite, patent, petioles up to 1 cm; blade ovate-elliptic to elliptic, 2–9 × 1.5–5 cm, apex acute, sometimes acuminate, base cuneate, margin entirely crenate, revolute, both surfaces sparsely strigose to strigose, venation pinnate, sometimes acrodromous. In f lorescences frondose; flowers arranged in lateral spikes, solitary, capituliform, 1–3 cm diam., cylindrical in fruit, up to 5 cm, peduncles 1–3 cm, densely hirsute; floral bracts whorled, broadly elliptic, apex acuminate, pu berulous with pedicellate glandular trichomes, pale green, sometimes pink, 5–15 mm, basal and apical bracts free; calyx tubular, ca. 2 mm, margin bifid, hir sute, accrescent in fruit; corolla white, sometimes lilac, 8–10 mm, puberulous. Fruit rounded, ca. 2 mm diam., splitting into 2 brown cluses, enclosed by accrescent calyx.

Distribucion y Habitat

Lippia paraguariensis is distributed in northeastern Argentina (Misiones), south- central Brazil (Goias, Mato Grosso do Sul), and Para guay (Fig. 19A, white circles), where it is found in the Cerrado and Alto Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregions.

Ejemplares de referencia

Colector N° Colect. Especie Departamento Provincia Imagen
  • Pedersen, T. M.
  • 9428 San Pedro

    Nombre Vulgar y Usos

    Tipo y Observaciones

    Material Tipo: Paraguay. Concepción: Río Apa, Nov. 1902, É. Hassler 7802 (lectotype, designated by H. N. Moldenke, Phytologia 12(5): 271. 1965, F 876609!; isolectotypes, F 74408!, G 307868!, G 307876!, G 307877!, G 307878!, K 470852!, MPU 12504!, NY 83772!, P 753844!, SI 3566!).
    Observaciones: Phenology. Lippia paraguariensis flowers and fruits from September to February. Taxonomic notes. Lippia paraguariensis is distin guished by its conspicuous floral bracts and patent ovate-elliptic leaves. See differences with L. lupulina under the treatment of that species. In the protologue of Lippia paraguariensis, Briquet (1904b) mentions its morphological similarity to L. lu- pulina but clarifies that it is possible to differentiate the two species by the leaves (reflexed and broadly ovate to cordate in L. lupulina vs. patent and ovate- elliptic to elliptic in L. paraguariensis), bracts (broadly ovate and colorful in L. lupulina vs. broadly elliptic and pale green in L. paraguariensis), and corolla color (pink or lilac in L. lupulina vs. white in L. paraguarien sis). Troncoso (1961) considered L. paraguariensis a variety of L. lupulina (var. albiflora), arguing that the diagnostic characters mentioned by Briquet are not strong enough to differentiate species. Salimena (2002) did not recognize varieties under L. lupulina and stated that the polymorphism observed might have an envi- ronmental origin. Based on the study of many speci- mens, in the present work we conclude that bract and leaf morphology can distinguish these taxa as different species and we reinstall L. paraguariensis.