Descripcion

No se encontro descripcion para la especie.

Distribucion y Habitat

Distribution: Argentina, at least from Buenos Aires and Pampa, south to Chubut, other records north of the indicated area in Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazil are here considered doubtful (see notes below) [84 BZS? 85 AGE AGS AGW? PAR? URU].

Ejemplares de referencia

Colector N° Colect. Especie Departamento Provincia Imagen
  • Correa, M. N.
  • -1 19 Buenos Aires
  • Hicken, C. M.
  • -1 (SI 198854) Tornquist Buenos Aires
  • Hicken, C. M.
  • -1 (SI 2357) Tornquist Buenos Aires
  • Hunziker, A. T.
  • 21366 General Roca Córdoba
  • Jörgensen, P.
  • 1568 Andalgalá Catamarca
  • Malme, G. O. A.
  • 678 Rio Grande do Sul
  • Mollura, P.
  • 32 Benito Juárez Buenos Aires
  • Osten, C.
  • 3303 Soriano
  • Parodi, L. R.
  • 7376 Pergamino Buenos Aires
  • Rossi, -
  • 172 -
  • Steibel, P.
  • 1933 La Pampa
  • Vervoorst, F. B.
  • 5274 Dolores Buenos Aires

    Nombre Vulgar y Usos

    Tipo y Observaciones

    Material Tipo: Nom. nov. para Carex involucrata Boott, nom. illeg., non Carex involucrata Boeckeler (1855).
    Observaciones: Iconography: Figures 1C, 2E, 3E. Additional figures in Boott (1858–1867: tabs. 209–2010, as Carex involucrata) and Barros (1935: 202, as C. sororia?). Etymology: From the Latin fossa, literally, ditch or pit, a term chosen by Wheeler (2002) to refer to the ‘weedy’ habitat of this species, often occurring in roadside verges, ditches or along railroad embankments. Notes: The illegitimate name Carex involucrata Boott remained in synonymy under C. sororia until Wheeler (2002) resurrected the taxon with the new name C.fossa. He presented a putative combination of characters including utricles and inflorescences distinctive of C. fossa and reported the species as occurring from the Argentinian Patagonia north to Salta, Paraguay and Uruguay. Wheeler did not study any actual voucher from the northern areas, and he entirely relied on bibliographic records reporting C. involucrata from there. He also mentioned a doubtful entity from northern Argentina and southern Brazil, C. sororia var. pseudobracteosa (Kük.) Kük., somehow intermediate between what he considered C. fossa and C. sororia. We have studied vouchers identified by Wheeler as C. fossa from the entire area, including Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazil. Whereas the specimens from the southern half of the range seems to us to be more or less constant and distinct from C. sororia, we agree with Wheeler that the delimitation of C. fossa becomes much problematic in the northern part of